top of page

Debunking the 90% Ground Fighting Myth: Unveiling the Truth About Street Fights and the Reality of the Ground Game, Showcasing the Effectiveness of JKD-Style Grappling

Updated: Jan 10

You've heard it whispered in gyms, muttered on forums, and seen it dramatized in countless action movies have ingrained a vivid image in our minds – two adversaries entangled in a pavement-bound grappling duel, locked in a fierce grappling match, has long dominated our portrayal of street fights. The pervasive notion that "90% of fights end up on the ground" has significantly shaped discussions within the martial arts realm, sparking debates on the role of grappling in self-defense. Fueled by Hollywood action sequences and martial arts lore, the belief that "most fights end up on the ground" has become almost gospel in self-defense circles. But how true is this oft-repeated claim? Does grappling truly reign supreme in the chaotic realm of real-world confrontations? Is grappling truly the king of street self-defense, or is it a Hollywood illusion or a rigged advertisement for BJJ that the early UFC was? However, a thorough examination of this claim unravels a more nuanced reality, challenging established ideas about the prevalence of grappling in real-world confrontations.

Debunking the Myth: How Often Do Fights Really Hit the Mat?

To unravel these inquiries, we must sift through the sensationalism and delve into the empirical evidence. An extensive investigation was done dissecting around 383 street fight incidents, which unravels compelling revelations regarding the applicability of grappling. Contrary to widespread assumptions, a mere 31% of these altercations advanced to ground engagements in a way that grappling would be useful, shedding light on the relatively infrequent utilization of grappling tactics in street encounters.

Analyzing Street Fight Dynamics:

Embarking on a quest to scrutinize the prevailing notion that the majority of confrontations find their resolution on the ground, this study meticulously delved into the data. The investigation centered on a thorough analysis encompassing 383 street altercations, complemented by law enforcement statistics and a scrutiny of the percentage of fights culminating in submissions in MMA bouts. The primary objective of this inquiry was to unveil the proportion of street fights transitioning to the ground, elucidate the underlying mechanisms leading to such scenarios, and assess the effectiveness of Jeet Kune Do (JKD) style grappling in street combat. To foster a shared understanding, the study operationally defined fights reaching the ground as those where grappling could yield advantages. In a conscious effort to avoid biases, our researchers navigated YouTube using generic terms such as "street fights," allowing auto-play to guide their selections. The revelatory findings defy the widely circulated notion, as only 31% of the 383 scrutinized street fights concluded on the ground where grappling skills would be useful, challenging the purported prevalence of 90% or 97%. Remarkably, 69% of surveyed fights never progressed to the ground in a way that grappling would be useful, concluding either standing or with a decisive knockout strike, underscoring the situational nature of grappling tactics in real-world scenarios.

Breaking Down Ground Fights:

Within the subset of street fights, constituting 31%, that reached the ground, a detailed breakdown exposed that 59% were incidents of falling or being knocked down. Going deeper, intentional takedowns played a crucial role in 41% of fights initiated on the ground, dispelling the notion of widespread grappling exchanges. This equates to a mere 13% of all street fights involving deliberate takedowns—a considerable deviation from the pervasive 90% myth. Notably, within that 13%, deliberate takedowns created a major advantage in 96% of cases, frequently concluding the fight. This highlights the strategic potency of well-executed throws in street self-defense. Therefore, employing throws proves highly advantageous in a street fight altercation. Astonishingly, 96% of fights initiated with takedowns resulted in a significant advantage for the initiator, underscoring the strategic value of prioritized grappling strategies.

Falling Down vs. Takedown Down: How Do Fights Hit the Deck?

The initial, and perhaps most astonishing, revelation is that a mere 31% of street fights in this study concluded on the ground in a manner where grappling skills would be applicable. A significant 69% remained upright, navigating through punches, kicks, and occasional clinches—comfortably or, at times, uncomfortably. Thus, the first piece in dismantling the myth has been revealed. But hold on, there's more! Even within that 31%, the descent to the ground isn't always a graceful transition. A surprising 59% of ground engagements stem from inadvertent incidents—stumbles, slips, and occasional well-placed shoves. Only 41% involve intentional takedowns, underscoring the influence of chance and surroundings in street confrontations.

Takedown Takeover: When Going Down Means Going Up

Now, let's delve into the fascinating aspect of this study. Those deliberate takedowns? They carry significant impact. In this specific category, intentional throws emerged as potent tools, conclusively concluding confrontations as an astounding 96% of fights initiated with takedowns resulted in a decisive advantage for the aggressor. In numerous instances, the takedown itself served as the decisive factor, leaving the opponent disoriented and bewildered on the unforgiving concrete surface. This highlights the potency of takedowns as a self-defense weapon, potentially resolving the altercation before it transforms into a full-scale brawl. Throws assume a pivotal role in street self-defense, positioning individuals as the initiators of advantageous confrontations.

Ground Control to Major Tom: Reality Check

However, solely relying on grappling may be less effective in a street fight scenario. Engaging in actions such as falling to the ground, pulling guard, and attempting submissions, commonly portrayed, constitute a minimal percentage of street encounters. This underscores the significance of maintaining a standing position, prioritizing throws to dominate the fight while avoiding the unpredictable nature of ground scenarios. The study indicates that positional control on the ground, particularly facilitating ground and pound, proves more effective than relying on submissions. Stressing the importance of executing powerful throws becomes a crucial element of street self-defense, as those who initiate confrontations benefit from throwing their opponents to the ground and utilizing positional control for effective ground and pound. The strategic advantage of grappling strategies, including hard throws, positional control, and ground and pound, is evident in the study's findings.

Officer Arrests vs. Street Scraps: Apples and Octagons?

Further debunking the 90% myth involves a scrutiny of officer arrests. Sergeant Greg Dossey's "Use of Force" study challenges the widespread claim that 97% of street fights hit the ground. His findings present a different narrative: a mere 2% of arrests involve resistance, and within that, only 62% end up with the individual restrained on the ground, making up just 1.4% of total arrests. The notion that 90% of fights go to the ground originates from LAPD use-of-force incidents, but in practice, unless the objective is to handcuff someone, arrests rarely reach the ground. These statistics starkly contrast the exaggerated claim. Similarly, James LaFond's study for The Violence Project, involving over 1,500 participants in violent encounters with Law Enforcement, discovered that 38% (aligning closely with the 31% from the previous street fight study) involved grappling. Crucially, these statistics specifically refer to mutual grappling, not takedowns for arrests or compliant arrests, offering a more realistic portrayal of physical engagement during officer arrests. This further underscores the discrepancy between the myth and reality.

Beyond Street Brawls: A Broader Perspective

Despite wrestling and takedowns being cornerstones of MMA, only roughly 25% of fights actually end with submissions. This shows that even in a controlled environment where grappling is heavily emphasized, other skills like striking and athleticism play a crucial role. This variation in submission rates across weight classes, with lighter fighters relying more on submissions and heavier fighters focusing on knockouts, further highlights the multifaceted nature of combat sports and the situational nature of grappling.

Jun Fan JKD Grappling in the Octagon of Reality: Grappling for the Win?

In the realm of street fights, grappling styles like Jun Fan Jeet Kune Do Grappling stand out as highly effective, particularly in achieving dominance without inflicting major damage. Jun Fan JKD Grappling excels in attaining advantageous positions, employing hard throws, and controlling confrontations strategically. Unlike some misconceptions, the frequency of utilizing submissions is limited, as most grappling-centric fights conclude before such techniques come into play. The street-oriented approach of Jun Fan JKD Grappling places emphasis on Kickboxing, Trapping, Clinching, Hard Throws, Positional Controls, Ground and Pound, and incorporates asymmetrical tactics like KinaMutai using biting and pinching to facilitate the ability to fight and escape to safety. This comprehensive approach enhances effectiveness in street altercations, allowing practitioners to handle diverse scenarios.

JKD-Style Grappling Effectiveness:

Jeet Kune Do (JKD) grappling isn't just about taking the fight to the ground; it encompasses a versatile arsenal. It's a complete toolbox: stand-up fighting for range, clinching and throws to close the distance, counter-grappling for staying in control, and ground-and-pound for finishing the fight. This diversity not only secures victory but grants the freedom to choose how to emerge triumphant. Need to escape? Disengage and move. Got multiple attackers? Deal with them one at a time. Even basic JKD skills can bring home the win. Throws, akin to magic, often conclude the fight instantly. In the event of ending up on the ground, JKD prioritizes seizing the top position, delivering strikes that keep you in control and the other guy in trouble. Grappling isn't always the first option. In most street fights, striking reigns supreme. But when the fight does go down, JKD's adaptability shines in the chaotic realm of street fights. You're ready to handle whatever comes your way, whether it's a takedown, a scramble, or just trying to stay on your feet, JKD equips you to handle diverse situations. The bottom line? JKD grappling is a powerful tool for self-defense. It's versatile, effective, and adapts to the unpredictable reality of street fights. So, while it's not all about hitting the mat, knowing how to grapple the JKD way can give you a serious edge when things get rough.

Jeet Kune Do's Impact in the Elite Circle of Top MMA Competition:

Jeet Kune Do, the brainchild of martial arts legend Bruce Lee, isn't just a stylish kicks-and-punches affair. It's a living, breathing system forged for the real world, it seamlessly integrates techniques specifically tailored for street fights. Picture this: JKD practitioners engage in intense partner sparring, constantly testing and refining their skills against unpredictable reactions. This pressure cooker environment breeds adaptability and lightning-fast reflexes, perfect for navigating the chaos of a street fight. But JKD isn't stuck in the past. Its core principles – efficiency, adaptability, and an eclectic approach – mirrored by the very essence of Modern Mixed Martial Arts.

Bruce Lee is the Forefather of MMA:

No wonder, figures like Dana White credit Bruce Lee as an MMA godfather. Lee's philosophy? Absorb what's useful, ditch the rest. Even way back in the opening sequence of Enter the Dragon, he envisioned a future of fighters in shorts and gloves, much like today's MMA scene. And the moves weren't just for show – Lee was a master of ground game with advanced submissions, and his kickboxing skills would earn him serious respect in any modern octagon. But Lee's influence went beyond flashy kicks. He trained a who's-who of top fighters like Mike Stone, Bob Wall, Joe Lewis, and Chuck Norris. Inspired by their time with Lee, these guys went on to pioneer American Kickboxing, a crucial pillar of modern MMA. Lee also championed the athletic lifestyle, paving the way for the focus on training and nutrition that dominates MMA today.

Bruce Lee’s Lasting Legacy Echoes in Modern MMA:

His enduring influence on MMA is palpable, as JKD borrows tools freely from boxing, Wing Chun, fencing, wrestling, and grappling arts like Judo and JuJitsu, creating a well-rounded skillset ideal for the diverse demands of the octagon. This inclusive approach seamlessly aligns with the multifaceted skill set demanded in the dynamic realm of MMA. Now, some of JKD's street-smart tools are a bit too "effective" for sanctioned competition – their potentially lethal nature makes them a no-go in the cage. But that doesn't mean JKD is out of the game. On the contrary, its influence is seeping into high-profile UFC fights. From Sean Sherk's footwork to Conor McGregor's unorthodox angles, you'll see glimpses of JKD's fluid adaptability everywhere you look.

The Continued Influence of Bruce Lee's Jeet Kune Do on the Evolution of MMA:

While certain JKD tools designed for self-defense are restricted in competitive arenas due to their potentially lethal nature, a growing trend sees these tools and principles making appearances in high-profile UFC fights. Renowned MMA fighters, including Sean Sherk, Greg Nelson, Brock Lesnar, Erik Paulson, Chris Wideman, Conor McGregor, Anderson Silva, Yori Nakamura, Ron Balicki, Jerome Le Banner, and Ben Saunders, seamlessly incorporate JKD into their skill sets. JKD's adaptability extends beyond conventional boundaries, fitting seamlessly into both MMA competitions and street-oriented self-defense situations. This versatility is precisely what makes JKD so compelling. It's equally at home in the competitive crucible of MMA and the unpredictable reality of self-defense. And with legendary names like Sifu Larry Hartsell (one of Bruce Lee's top students) refining and expanding JKD through systems into an Integrated Grappling system, its impact on the fighting world is only going to grow through Coaches like Erik Paulson and Greg Nelson.

The Real Threat: Addressing the Multiple-Attacker Issue!

Addressing the concern of multiple attackers, this is a big concern in any street fight. But here's the thing: JKD training focuses on dealing with one opponent at a time. By taking down or controlling one attacker, you often deter the others, giving you space to handle the situation. Surprisingly, the examination also brought to light an unexpected aspect concerning encounters with multiple attackers. Contrary to common assumptions, the risk of facing additional assailants while on the ground is not as widespread as one might presume. Only three instances out of the 49 intentional takedowns involved encounters with extra aggressors. Conversely, fights rooted in striking were more likely to draw unwanted attention, with multiple attackers being more inclined to intervene when one of their associates was knocked down. This indicates that in a scenario focused on striking, being knocked down is more likely to attract assistance from others. While dealing with a mass attack on the ground is a legitimate concern, its significance may not be as exaggerated as some suggest. Nevertheless, it remains a reality that requires training preparation, particularly addressing the standing aspect of mass attacks and acknowledging the potential for ground engagement.

Grounded Truth: What Does It All Mean?

So, what can we conclude from this deep dive into the world of street fights?

  • The 90% ground fighting myth is busted. Less than a third of fights actually go to the ground in a relevant way where skill-based grappling would be useful.

  • Takedowns are powerful tools. When used effectively, they can quickly tip the scales in your favor and give you the upper hand.

  • Grappling skills are valuable. JKD's focus on dominant positions and control proves highly effective in real-world confrontations.

  • Multiple attacker dangers are often overstated. The threat is generally greater during striking exchanges, at any rate it is a reality you should prepare for.

The bottom line? While ground fighting has its place in self-defense, prioritizing solid stand-up skills and effective takedowns is key. Remember, the best way to avoid the ground is to never hit it in the first place. And if you do find yourself there, practice explosive transitions and getting back on your feet quickly to finish the job. Ultimately, self-defense is about awareness, avoidance, and de-escalation. But when push comes to shove (or punch), understanding the true dynamics of street fights can equip you with the knowledge and skills to face any situation with confidence.

Summary of Street Fight Observations:

Less than one-third of street altercations result in ground engagement where grappling skills would prove useful. Notably, takedowns emerged as highly effective techniques in street fighting, capable of either concluding the fight or positioning the initiator advantageously. JKD-style grappling showcased its effectiveness in maintaining dominance, demonstrating similarities to Judo rather than Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu in the context of street fights. Our findings, derived from a survey of nearly 400 random street fights, law enforcement data, and MMA contests, challenge misconceptions surrounding the prevalence of ground encounters. JKD-style grappling stands out as a valuable self-defense tool, particularly given that the majority of street fights remain upright. Prioritizing the development of a robust stand-up JKD street fighting repertoire, with a focus on efficient takedowns, remains paramount. In conclusion, while ground fighting has its merits, a comprehensive self-defense strategy should prioritize stand-up techniques for practicality and safety.

Truth Matters: Dispelling the Hype and Prioritizing Effectiveness

The exaggeration of claims regarding the prevalence of ground fighting has fostered widespread misconceptions about effective self-defense strategies. It's crucial to dispel these myths and foster a more accurate understanding of physical altercations. By presenting evidence-based data, we can bridge the gap between perception and reality, guiding individuals toward practical and effective self-defense strategies that align with the true dynamics of street fights. This shift from exaggerated claims to evidence-based insights empower individuals to make informed decisions about their self-defense training, emphasizing techniques that are proven to work in a variety of real-world scenarios. Ultimately, the goal is to equip individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to navigate physical confrontations successfully and stay safe in unpredictable situations.

Conclusion: Staying True to the Streets

These findings provide a vivid illustration of the potency of throws as formidable tools in street self-defense, offering a distinct advantage and frequently resulting in a conclusive outcome. Conversely, relying solely on submissions after falling to the ground proved less successful in real-world situations. Research by Sergeant Greg Dossey and The Violence Project aligns with these conclusions, highlighting the lower occurrence of grappling in real-world encounters. Even within the controlled environment of MMA fights, grappling doesn't dominate. The statistics presented debunk exaggerated claims of 97% or 90% of fights heading to the ground, underscoring the pivotal role of accurate data in discussions about real-world encounters. While grappling skills hold value in specific situations, the myth that 90% of fights go to the ground lacks substantial evidence. Prioritizing standing control, effective throws, and ground & pound remains essential for self-defense readiness. By acknowledging the authentic dynamics of physical altercations, individuals can acquire the knowledge and skills needed to navigate real-world situations safely. In the unpredictable street reality, self-defense revolves around awareness, avoidance, and de-escalation. Understanding the genuine dynamics of street fights can be the key to achieving a safe resolution, distinguishing it from a Hollywood-style ending.

23 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page